Clinical Studies

The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for Preventing Surgical Site Infection

Published:

Authors:

Shogan BD, Vogel JD, Davis BR, et al. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for Preventing Surgical Site Infection. <em>Dis Colon Rectum</em>. 2024;67(11):1368-1382. doi:10.1097/DCR.0000000000003450

Excerpt:

"Wound protectors can decrease the incidence of SSI after colorectal surgery. Strength of recommendation: strong based on high-quality evidence."

"...double-ring devices were found to exhibit a greater protective effect than single-ring devices."

Link To ARTICLE

Efficacy of a Dual-Ring Wound Protector for Prevention of Surgical Site Infections After Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Patients with Intrabiliary Stents: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Published:

Annals of Surgery; 2018 July

Authors:

Bressan AK, Aubin JM, Martel G, et al. Efficacy of a Dual-ring Wound Protector for Prevention of Surgical Site Infections After Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Patients With Intrabiliary Stents: A Randomized Clinical Trial. <em>Ann Surg.</em> 2018;268(1):35-40. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000002614

Excerpt:

“Among adult patients with intrabiliary stents, the use of a dual-ring wound protector during [pancreaticoduodenectomy] significantly reduces the risk of incisional SSI (surgical site infection).”

Link To ARTICLE

Wound Protectors in Reducing Surgical Site Infections in Lower Gastrointestinal Surgery: An Updated Meta-analysis

Published:

Surgical Endoscopy; 2018 March

Authors:

Zhang L, Elsolh B, Patel SV. Wound protectors in reducing surgical site infections in lower gastrointestinal surgery: an updated meta-analysis. <em>Surg Endosc.</em> 2018;32(3):1111-1122. doi:10.1007/s00464-017-6012-0

Excerpt:

“We demonstrated evidence of a subgroup difference where dual-ring wound protectors reduced SSIs while single-ring retractors did not, which provides greater insight in the choice of wound protection devices.

“Our meta-analysis found that dual-ring wound protectors reduce the odds of SSI (surgical site infection) in patients undergoing lower gastrointestinal surgery. . . .”

Link To ARTICLE

Wound Protectors Reduce Surgical Site Infection: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Published:

Annals of Surgery; 2012 July

Authors:

Edwards JP, Ho AL, Tee MC, Dixon E, Ball CG. Wound protectors reduce surgical site infection: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. <em>Ann Surg.</em> 2012;256(1):53-59. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182570372

Excerpt:

“Our study suggests that the use of wound protectors decreases the risk of SSI by 45%. Our number needed to treat suggests that only 10 patients would have to be treated intraoperatively with a wound protector to prevent 1 SSI. . . .

“Impervious plastic wound protectors reduce the risk of SSI (surgical site infection) when employed in non-trauma-related gastrointestinal and biliary tract surgery. Wound protectors represent a safe and simple intervention that may reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality. . . .”

Link To ARTICLE

Alexis O Ring Retractor vs Conventional Wound Protection for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infections in Colorectal Resections

Published:

Colorectal Disease; 2012 June

Authors:

Cheng KP, Roslani AC, Sehha N, et al. ALEXIS O-Ring wound retractor vs conventional wound protection for the prevention of surgical site infections in colorectal resections(1). <em>Colorectal Dis.</em> 2012;14(6):e346-e351. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.02943.x

Excerpt:

“The [Alexis] wound retractor is more effective in preventing SSI (surgical site infection) in elective colorectal resections compared with conventional methods.”

Link To ARTICLE

Barrier Wound Protection Decreases Surgical Site Infection in Open Elective Colorectal Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Published:

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum; 2010 October

Authors:

Reid K, Pockney P, Draganic B, Smith SR. Barrier wound protection decreases surgical site infection in open elective colorectal surgery: a randomized clinical trial. <em>Dis Colon Rectum.</em> 2010;53(10):1374-1380. doi:10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181ed3f7e

Excerpt:

“In this study the use of barrier wound protection in elective open colorectal resectional surgery resulted in a clinically significant reduction in incisional surgical site infections. Barrier wound protection of this nature should be considered routine in this type of surgery.”

Link To ARTICLE

Use of Wound-Protection System and Postoperative Wound-Infection Rates in Open Appendectomy

Published:

Archives of Surgery; 2009 September

Authors:

Lee P, Waxman K, Taylor B, Yim S. Use of Wound-Protection System and Postoperative Wound-Infection Rates in Open Appendectomy: A Randomized Prospective Trial. <em>Arch Surg.</em> 2009;144(9):872–875. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2009.151

Excerpt:

“Our data support the use of a wound-protection device in open surgery as a method of decreasing postoperative wound-infection rates. This technique could be applied to a broader spectrum of open surgical procedures and ultimately reduce the economic and emotional burden of a preventable SSI (surgical site infection).”

Link To ARTICLE

Randomized, Controlled Investigation of the Anti-infective Properties of the Alexis Retractor/Protector of Incision Sites

Published:

The Journal of Trauma-Injury & Critical Care; 2007 January

Authors:

Horiuchi T, Tanishima H, Tamagawa K, et al. Randomized, controlled investigation of the anti-infective properties of the Alexis retractor/protector of incision sites. <em>J Trauma.</em> 2007;62(1):212-215. doi:10.1097/01.ta.0000196704.78785.ae

Excerpt:

“The results of this study demonstrate that wound infection decreased significantly in the with Alexis retractor group.”

Link To ARTICLE

Contact Form

Please have a representative contact me

Please send me a clinical study booklet


Thank you!

Your submission has been received.